Calculator
ClaudeAnthropic
ChatGPTOpenAI

Claude vs ChatGPT: API prices, benchmarks and which to pick

Claude has the cheaper API in 1 of 3 tiers. For example, in the flagship tier, Claude Fable 5.2 $8.00 / $40.00 vs GPT-6 Astra $10.00 / $50.00 per million tokens; they also differ in cached input and long-prompt pricing.

Prices checked 13 Nov 2026

Compare two different models →
Cheapest flagship APIClaudeClaude Fable 5.2 is 20% cheaper
Cheapest mid-tier APITieClaude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Sol: $2.00 / $10.00
Cheapest budget APITieClaude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-6 Luna: $0.10 / $0.50
Largest context windowChatGPTClaude Fable 5.2 1M vs GPT-6 Astra 1.05M tokens

API prices, tier by tier

Per 1M tokens, in / out · US dollars
Claude and ChatGPT API prices by tier
TierClaudeChatGPT
FlagshipClaude Fable 5.2$8.00 / $40.00Cheaper by 20%GPT-6 Astra$10.00 / $50.00
Mid-tierClaude Sonnet 5.5$2.00 / $10.00GPT-6.1 Sol$2.00 / $10.00
BudgetClaude Haiku 5.5$0.10 / $0.50GPT-6 Luna$0.10 / $0.50
Models listed, not marked legacy511

This page lays out the list prices, what typical workloads cost, and the public benchmark results we could find for these models, each with its source and the date we checked it.

Flagship: GPT-6 Astra's rates rise to $20/$75 on prompts over 272K tokens.

Mid-tier: GPT-6.1 Sol's rates rise on prompts over 272K tokens. Sonnet 5.5 bills its whole context window at the standard rate.

Budget: The budget match holds on short prompts only: Haiku 5.5 bills a higher rate once a prompt passes 100K tokens, GPT-6 Luna once it passes 272K.

Context, batch and cache

Cached input per 1M tokens · batch discount off list price
Context window, batch discount and cached input price by tier
TierClaudeChatGPT
FlagshipContext: 1M tokensBatch: 50% offCached input: $0.20Context: 1.05M tokensBatch: 50% offCached input: $1.00
Mid-tierContext: 1M tokensBatch: 50% offCached input: $0.10Context: 1.05M tokensBatch: 50% offCached input: $0.10
BudgetContext: 1M tokensBatch: 50% offCached input: $0.010Context: 1.05M tokensBatch: 50% offCached input: $0.010

What typical workloads cost

Monthly cost at list prices, no batch or caching, for four request shapes.

Flagship: Claude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-6 Astra

Monthly cost of typical workloads, Flagship
WorkloadClaude Fable 5.2GPT-6 Astra
Chatbot50K requests × 1.5K in / 400 out$1,400Cheaper by 20%$1,750
Document Q&A10K requests × 12K in / 600 out$1,200Cheaper by 20%$1,500
Coding agent5K requests × 30K in / 2K out$1,600Cheaper by 20%$2,000
Summaries200K requests × 4K in / 300 out$8,800Cheaper by 20%$11,000

Mid-tier: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Monthly cost of typical workloads, Mid-tier
WorkloadClaude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6.1 Sol
Chatbot50K requests × 1.5K in / 400 out$350.00$350.00
Document Q&A10K requests × 12K in / 600 out$300.00$300.00
Coding agent5K requests × 30K in / 2K out$400.00$400.00
Summaries200K requests × 4K in / 300 out$2,200$2,200

Budget: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna

Monthly cost of typical workloads, Budget
WorkloadClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-6 Luna
Chatbot50K requests × 1.5K in / 400 out$17.50$17.50
Document Q&A10K requests × 12K in / 600 out$15.00$15.00
Coding agent5K requests × 30K in / 2K out$20.00$20.00
Summaries200K requests × 4K in / 300 out$110.00$110.00
Try your own numbers in the calculator →

Public benchmark results

Results from third-party leaderboards, quoted as published and checked on the date shown. They are not our tests, scores move as models and test harnesses are updated, and a benchmark is not your workload.

Public benchmark results for Claude and ChatGPT models
BenchmarkClaudeChatGPTSourceChecked
Terminal-Bench 4.0, Flagship (Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra)58.08%59.60% (higher)[1]
Terminal-Bench 4.0, Mid-tier (Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol)64.14% (higher)55.05%[1]
Terminal-Bench 4.0, Budget (Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna)36.36% (higher)13.64%[1]
Vibe Code Bench v1.1, Flagship (Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra)90.26% (higher)89.59%[2]
Vibe Code Bench v1.1, Mid-tier (Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol)92.39% (higher)88.93%[2]
Vibe Code Bench v1.1, Budget (Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna)90.44% (higher)81.65%[2]
Terminal-Bench 4.0, Claude Opus 5.5 (not part of a tier pair)65.15%—[1]
Vibe Code Bench v1.1, Claude Opus 5.5 (not part of a tier pair)90.29%—[2]
Intelligence Index, Flagship (Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra), $ per task at that setting53 ($7.63)53 ($3.26)[3]
Intelligence Index, Mid-tier (Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol), $ per task at that setting56 ($5.46) (higher)52 ($0.72)[3]
Intelligence Index, Budget (Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna), $ per task at that setting43 ($0.21) (higher)38 ($0.07)[3]
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0
    TierClaudeChatGPT
    FlagshipFable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra58.08%59.60% (higher)
    Mid-tierSonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol64.14% (higher)55.05%
    BudgetHaiku 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna36.36% (higher)13.64%
    Claude Opus 5.5not part of a tier pair65.15%—
    Source [1]· Checked
  • Vibe Code Bench v1.1
    TierClaudeChatGPT
    FlagshipFable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra90.26% (higher)89.59%
    Mid-tierSonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol92.39% (higher)88.93%
    BudgetHaiku 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna90.44% (higher)81.65%
    Claude Opus 5.5not part of a tier pair90.29%—
    Source [2]· Checked
  • Intelligence Index · $ per task at that setting
    TierClaudeChatGPT
    FlagshipFable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra53 ($7.63)53 ($3.26)
    Mid-tierSonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol56 ($5.46) (higher)52 ($0.72)
    BudgetHaiku 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna43 ($0.21) (higher)38 ($0.07)
    Source [3]· Checked

Terminal-Bench 4.0 and Vibe Code Bench are agentic coding tests; higher is better. The Intelligence Index is Artificial Analysis's combined score, with the dollar cost of its run per task in brackets. Each Intelligence Index figure is the max reasoning setting listed for that model.

Which to pick for what

Mid-tier work where cost per finished task mattersGPT-6.1 Sol

It lists at the same $2.00 / $10.00 as Sonnet 5.5, but Artificial Analysis recorded far fewer dollars per task for it on its index run (see the benchmarks above). List price alone does not predict the bill: how many tokens a model spends does.

Agentic coding and terminal tasks at the mid-tierClaude Sonnet 5.5

On Vals AI's Terminal-Bench 4.0 and Vibe Code Bench it scored higher than GPT-6.1 Sol, at the same list price and with a 1M-token window billed at standard rates.

Benchmarked Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra: agent work and cost per taskGPT-6 Astra

In the benchmark runs we checked, it scored slightly higher than Fable 5.1 on Terminal-Bench 4.0, and Artificial Analysis recorded a lower cost per task for it (see the Intelligence Index rows above). Fable 5.1 edged it on Vibe Code Bench. Those runs predate Fable 5.2, which is listed at $8.00 / $40.00 and has no benchmark rows here yet.

Leads Terminal-Bench, at a lower price than Fable 5.1Claude Opus 5.5

At $4.00 / $20.00 it ranks first on Vals AI's Terminal-Bench 4.0 (65.15%) and scores 90.29% on Vibe Code Bench, above both Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra on each. We pair Fable 5.2 with GPT-6 Astra by price tier, but Opus 5.5 is the cheaper Claude model to test first for agentic coding. GPT-5.6 Sol is listed at $4.00 / $20.00 too, on a promotional rate that OpenAI says runs until 30 November 2026; we did not pair it by tier.

Repeated long prompts at the top tierClaude Fable 5.2

Cached input is $0.20 per million tokens against $1.00 for GPT-6 Astra. If most of your input is a reused prefix, that gap is the main price difference between them.

Budget tasks on short promptsClaude Haiku 5.5

Same $0.10 / $0.50 as GPT-6 Luna and scored higher on both Vals AI benchmarks above. Keep prompts under 100K tokens.

Budget tasks on long promptsGPT-6 Luna

It holds its $0.10 / $0.50 rate to 272K tokens, where Haiku 5.5's rate rises after 100K. Artificial Analysis also recorded a lower cost per task for it than for Haiku 5.5 (see the Intelligence Index rows above).

Output quality: coming soon. We plan to run the same dated set of tasks through both APIs and publish the prompts and answers here. Until then, apart from the third-party results above, this page compares cost only. Noted 20 Oct 2026.

Subscription plans: Claude vs ChatGPT

The same comparison for people who pay a monthly plan instead of the API: paired by US price in US dollars, with Enterprise set beside Enterprise.

Claude and ChatGPT tiers paired by US price point
Price pointClaudeChatGPT
FreeClaude FreeFreeChatGPT FreeFree
$8 a monthNo equivalentChatGPT Go$8 a month
$20 a monthClaude Pro$20 a monthChatGPT Plus$20 a month
$100 a monthClaude Max$100 a monthChatGPT Pro 100$100 a month
$200 a monthClaude Ultra$200 a monthChatGPT Pro 200$200 a month
$500 a monthNo equivalentChatGPT Pro 500$500 a month
$25 a seat a monthClaude Team Standard seat$25 a seat a monthChatGPT Business Standard seat$25 a seat a month
$125 a seat a monthClaude Team Premium seat$125 a seat a monthChatGPT Business Premium seat$125 a seat a month
EnterpriseClaude Enterprise$20 a seat a month, billed annually, plus usage at API ratesChatGPT EnterpriseCustom pricing. Contact sales

Next steps

Claude vs ChatGPT FAQ

Is Claude cheaper than ChatGPT?

On list price, the two are close at every tier. Claude Haiku 5.5 matches GPT-6 Luna's $0.10/$0.50 for prompts up to 100,000 tokens, Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs exactly the same as GPT-6.1 Sol ($2/$10), Claude Opus 5.5 matches GPT-5.6 Sol's promotional $4/$20 exactly, and Claude Fable 5.2 is cheaper than GPT-6 Astra. The main gap left is long prompts at the budget end: above 100,000 tokens Haiku 5.5 bills $0.50/$2.50, while GPT-6 Luna stays at $0.10/$0.50 up to 272K tokens and $0.20/$0.75 beyond.

Do both offer batch processing?

Yes — both discount batch jobs by 50% on input and output. Anthropic supports it across all active Claude models, and OpenAI's Batch API covers the GPT family including the GPT-6 and GPT-5.6 models.